Abstract
The aim of this research is to examine the impact of erosion on aero foils by performing an extensive CFD analysis. To better comprehend the aerodynamic phenomenon, the inquiry includes 2D evaluations, involving steady-state and transient evaluations. Since different aerospace manufacturers produce aircraft with different aero foil profiles for the flight wings and tail, this study uses different aero foil profiles and uses CFD simulations using Star CCM+ to perform 2D numerical assessments. The main emphasis is on determining the drag coefficient, lift, and moment in order to determine which aero foil produces the most lift force. Aero foil wings are prone to erosion, which leads to dents and pits. This work will simulate different pit sizes on 2Daero foil wings and then analyse the aerodynamic forces. In order to provide insight on how erosion affects wings’ aerodynamic performance, the research explores how pit size affects lift, drag, and moment.
5.1 Workingprocedure of simulation
The initial strategy for this aerodynamic investigation involves the digital replication of an aero foil’s behavior within a two-dimensional framework. Four distinct aerofoil profiles, namely NACA0015, NACA0021, NACA2412, and NACA 4412, have been selected for this purpose. These profiles are characterized by their unique shapes, which are crucial for understanding the aerodynamic performance under various conditions.
The geometry of these aero foils is constructed using coordinate data provided by the (NACA). This data, typically offered in x and y coordinates, forms the basis of the aero foil shape. Utilizing computational tools, this raw coordinate data is transformed into a precise geometrical representation of the aero foil within the simulation environment.
Aerofoil models such as NACA0015, NACA0021, NACA2412, and NACA4412 are standardized aero foil shapes developed by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA). The NACA0015 and NACA0021 are part of the NACA 00 series, which are symmetrical and characterized by their uniform thickness distribution. The NACA0015 has a thickness-to-chord ratio of 15%, while the NACA0021 is thicker at 21%. The NACA2412 and NACA4412 belong to the NACA 4-digit series, designed with camber lines to enhance lift. The NACA2412 has a maximum camber of 2% located at 40% of the chord from the leading edge, and a thickness of 12%. The NACA4412 has a camber of 4% positioned at 40% chord, with a thickness of 12%. These airfoils are widely used in a variety of applications, including aircraft wings, turbine blades, and other aerodynamic components due to their well-documented performance characteristics.
The schematic diagram of NACA0015 aero foil is shown in Fig. 7. The NACA0015 is a symmetrical aero foil with a 15% thickness-to-chord ratio as mentioned earlier. With a 1m chord length, it’s utilized in various applications, from subsonic aircraft wings to wind turbine blades, providing a balance of lift and drag characteristics for steady performance.
Fig: 7. NACA 0015 aerofoil.
The air domain surrounding an aerofoil is a crucial factor in determining its performance. It is essentially the environment that the aerofoil interacts with during flight, which, in this instance, is air. To accurately simulate the behavior of the aerofoil, it is imperative to consider the various air flow velocities it will encounter. These velocities are categorized by Reynolds numbers, a dimensionless quantity that helps in understanding the flow dynamics around the aerofoil.
The simulation’s effectiveness hinges on the ability to replicate the varying aerodynamic conditions that an aerofoil faces in real-world applications. Whether it’s a slow glide or a high-speed dive, the aerofoil must be tested against a spectrum of scenarios to ensure reliability and efficiency in its design. By adjusting the flow velocities and observing the corresponding effects on the aerofoil, engineers can predict and optimize its performance across different flight conditions.
In the context of the NACA0015 aerofoil model, the air domain is represented in the schematic diagram seen in Fig. 8. The model is set within a sizable space, measuring 20 meters by 20 meters, featuring a substantial radius of 20 meters. This expansive area is critical to minimize the influence of boundary effects on the aerofoil’s performance during simulations. By maintaining such a dimension, the simulation can more accurately portray the free-stream conditions the aerofoil would experience in an unrestricted environment, thus ensuring the validity and applicability of the results.
The completed structure has been isolated from its environmental context, as depicted in Figure 9. This isolated segment is designated for subsequent evaluation. Detailed examination of this component will provide deeper insights into its characteristics and performance. The focus on this specific part allows for a more targeted and thorough analysis, which will contribute to the overall understanding of the system.
hi this is